|
Grassroots effort saves potlucks
A grassroots effort led by Chrys
Ostrander, former program coordinator for Spokane Tilth, influenced the
state’s new Food Code, adopted in September by the Washington State
Board of Health.
“When it goes into effect in May 2005, it will allow anyone in
Washington to host a community potluck and to advertise the potluck to
the general public if desired,” Chrys said.
The code defines a potluck as
a gathering to which people bring food to share without compensation,
charge or commercial purpose.
“It surprised the Department of Health that so many people and
organizations contacted it during the rule-making process to defend our
right to commune over good ol’ home-cooked food whenever and wherever
we want,” he said.
Offering some background,
Chrys said that for more than 100 years, residents of the state have
cooked meals at home and brought those meals to churches, grange halls,
community centers, schools, businesses, charity organizations and other
venues to dine with other members of their communities who also brought
food to share.
“In fact, this tradition has its roots deep in human history,” he
said. “Gathering around a table heaped with food that was brought
from multiple homes to share and enjoy has been a form of human
fellowship we have taken for granted for a long time.”
Washington State had no
statewide rule governing whether potluck suppers should be
regulated the same way that restaurants, grocery stores and other “food
service establishments” are. It was left up to the counties to
interpret the Washington Food Code. Some counties require potlucks to
be operated like restaurants, making it illegal for most foods served
at potlucks to be cooked at home.
“The new wording will permit organizations to hold potlucks without
having to conform to costly licensing requirements or spoiling the fun
by outlawing home-cooked foods,” he said. “The current wording does not
single out publicly advertised potlucks for any greater scrutiny than
any other type of potluck.”
Chrys describes the effort as
a “struggle to decriminalize potluck suppers.”
“Previously a nonprofit organization, charity, political group, book
club or church was breaking the law in some localities if it
advertised a potluck to the public without notifying the public health
authority and complying with state and local food service establishment
rules.
In 2002, a group of concerned people and organizations went to the
Washington State Department of Health (DOH) to bring “some sanity to
their attitude towards publicly advertised potluck suppers,” Chrys
said.
“After numerous heated, tedious meetings at which we reiterated over
and over that our freedom to invite our communities to potluck suppers
was something that should not be regulated, we thought we had emerged
victorious,” he said. “On Feb. 5, 2003, the stakeholder group—including
representatives from DOH, local health authorities, food industry
representatives, farmers and just plain folks—reached consensus on
language exempting potlucks from regulation.”
This consensus was re-confirmed at a DOH meeting on March 4,
2003. However, a DOH “Core Group” removed the language that
included “publicly advertised” potlucks in the exemption.
In the rest of 2003, the potluck
advocates mounted a campaign with emails and web-based
information, organized phone calls and attended DOH hearings around the
state to assert: “Potlucks, whether advertised to the general public or
not, should be exempt from Food Code regulation!”
“They heard us,” Chrys said. “I was told that DOH received more
comments on the potluck issue than any other aspect of the food code.
As a result, DOH reinstated the wording that includes publicly
advertised potlucks in the exemption. This is the wording that is in
the newly adopted code.
Among the organizations backing the effort along with Spokane Tilth were People for Environmental
Action and Children’s Health (PEACH), the Washington State Grange,
Potlucks for Peace, the Ballard Alki Lodge #170 of the Independent
Order of Odd Fellows and several churches.
“In October 2002, Spokane Tilth, a Chapter of Washington Tilth
Association, was threatened with prosecution for announcing that we
wanted to honor our local farmers by hosting a harvest celebration and
community potluck supper that featured locally-grown foods that
participants would prepare at home and bring to share at a community
facility,” Chrys said.
“We felt this was an excessive intrusion by government regulators into
a non-commercial activity that is really a private affair among
neighbors,” he said. “We received messages of outrage and
encouragement to fight against this injustice from many individuals and
groups around the state.”
Chrys lives at Tolstoy Farm near Davenport and is a grower of organic
produce and botanicals.
For information, call 725-0610.
By Mary Stamp, Fig Tree editor
- © October 2004
|